From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755436Ab0IWWMz (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:12:55 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:34859 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752747Ab0IWWMy (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:12:54 -0400 Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:12:19 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt cc: Richard Cochran , LKML , John Stultz , Rodolfo Giometti , Peter Zijlstra , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Lameter , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, David Miller , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Krzysztof Halasa Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] posix clocks: introduce a syscall for clock tuning. In-Reply-To: <1285279423.5158.20.camel@pasglop> Message-ID: References: <1285279423.5158.20.camel@pasglop> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 24 Sep 2010, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 19:31 +0200, Richard Cochran wrote: > > The new syscall, clock_adjtime, takes two parameters, the clock ID, > > and a pointer to a struct timex. The semantics of the timex struct > > have been expanded by one additional mode flag, which allows an > > absolute offset correction. When specificied, the clock offset is > > immediately corrected by adding the given time value to the current > > time value. > > Any reason why you CC'ed device-tree discuss ? > > This list is getting way too much unrelated stuff, which I find > annoying, it would be nice if we were all a bit more careful here with > our CC lists. Says the guy who missed to trim the useless context of the original mail, which made me scroll down all the way just to find out that there is nothing to see. Thanks, tglx