From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754211Ab0I1VgF (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:36:05 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:60433 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753872Ab0I1VgD (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:36:03 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:35:51 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Yinghai Lu cc: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Fwd: [PATCH] x86: Plug memory leak in sparse irq In-Reply-To: <4CA25E5C.2020203@kernel.org> Message-ID: References: <4CA25E5C.2020203@kernel.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Yinghai Lu wrote: > > From: Thomas Gleixner > > Date: Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:57 AM > > Subject: [PATCH] x86: Plug memory leak in sparse irq > > To: LKML > > Cc: x86@kernel.org, Yinghai Lu > > > > > > free_irq_cfg() is not freeing the cpumask_vars in irq_cfg. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > > Cc: stable@kernel.org > > --- > > arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 6 ++++-- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > > +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c > > @@ -311,9 +311,11 @@ void arch_init_copy_chip_data(struct irq > > init_copy_irq_2_pin(old_cfg, cfg, node); > > } > > > > -static void free_irq_cfg(struct irq_cfg *old_cfg) > > +static void free_irq_cfg(struct irq_cfg *cfg) > > { > > - kfree(old_cfg); > > + free_cpumask_var(cfg->domain); > > + free_cpumask_var(cfg->old_domain); > > + kfree(cfg); > > } > > > > void arch_free_chip_data(struct irq_desc *old_desc, struct irq_desc *desc) > > yes. still need Was about to send that out next. > [PATCH] x86: copy cpumask while copying chip_data for offstack cpumask > > While looking Thomas's > | x86: Plug memory leak in sparse irq > > found copy_chip_data() could copy the cpumask pointers instead of real data. > Need to use cpumask_copy there. Sigh. That code should just depend on CONFIG_BROKEN, really. Thanks, tglx