From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753915Ab0JCNtM (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Oct 2010 09:49:12 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:56665 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753844Ab0JCNtK (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Oct 2010 09:49:10 -0400 Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 15:48:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Grant Likely cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , LKML , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mundt , David Woodhouse , Jesse Barnes , Yinghai Lu , "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [patch 00/47] Sparse irq rework In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20100930221351.682772535@linutronix.de> <20101003112312.GB9844@angua.secretlab.ca> <20101003112920.GB32736@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-1463795968-1081961718-1286113700=:14550" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---1463795968-1081961718-1286113700=:14550 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Sun, 3 Oct 2010, Grant Likely wrote: > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 5:29 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 05:23:12AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:14:27PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> > The following patch series cleans up and mostly reimplements the core > >> > sparse irq implementation and sanitizes the most complex (ab)user: > >> > arch/x86 > >> > >> Hoy Thomas, > >> > >> patches 1-13 & 15 all look fine to me.  Feel free to add my Acked-by: > >> line. > >> > >> Patch 14 seems to be missing, and by inference it appears that the > >> all important new allocator is added by patch 14.  All of the rest of > >> the series seems to be fine, but I'm forced to make assumptions about > >> what the new allocator looks like, so I cannot be positive. > > > > Patch 14 was present, you were even CC'd on it. > > Hmmm... found it now. I'm not sure what happened there, but I > couldn't find it the first time I looked. Most likely it is a PEBKAC > failure. Sorry for the noise. > > Okay, patch 14 looks good to me too (including Yinghai's comment). > The new allocator seems sane, and I didn't see any obvious errors in > patches 16-47. I've not tested any of this yet. Hopefully I'll be > able to carve out some time to do so early this week. Wait until I pushed out a fixed tree. In meantime I found out how I managed to screw up the quilt series :( Will post, once it's ready. Thanks, tglx ---1463795968-1081961718-1286113700=:14550--