From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756814Ab0JKWaV (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:30:21 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:51626 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756737Ab0JKWaU (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:30:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:29:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Andrew Morton cc: Richard Weinberger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jdike@addtoit.com, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net, peterz@infradead.org, tj@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] um: Get rid of __do_IRQ() In-Reply-To: <20101011151447.1a022f25.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Message-ID: References: <1286832575-21474-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <20101011151447.1a022f25.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 23:29:35 +0200 > Richard Weinberger wrote: > > > This patch removes __do_IRQ() from user mode linux. > > I'd never actually noticed CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO__DO_IRQ. > > What's the plan here? Are all architectures supposed to me migrating > away from __do_IRQ() and over to generic_handle_irq(), or what? Yes, that's why __do_IRQ() is deprecated since 3 years.