From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Louis Rilling <louis.rilling@kerlabs.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Matthieu Fertré" <matthieu.fertre@kerlabs.com>,
"Darren Hart" <darren@dvhart.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] futex: fix key reference counter in case of requeue.
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:16:54 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1010151228130.2496@localhost6.localdomain6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1287055805-18233-1-git-send-email-louis.rilling@kerlabs.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 3428 bytes --]
On Thu, 14 Oct 2010, Louis Rilling wrote:
> From: Matthieu Fertré <matthieu.fertre@kerlabs.com>
>
> This patch ensures that we are referring to the right key when dropping
> reference for the futex_wait operation.
>
> The following scenario explains a typical case where the bug was
> happening:
>
> Process P calls futex_wait() on futex identified by 'key1'. 2 references
> are taken on this key: one for the struct futex_q itself, and one for the
> futex_wait operation.
It took a while to understand that explanation. You mean we get one
ref in get_key_ref() and one in queue_lock(), right ?
> If now, process P is requeued on a futex identified by 'key2', its
> futex_q->key is updated from 'key1' to 'key2' and a reference is got
> to 'key2' and one is dropped to 'key1'.
Correct.
> Later, another process calls futex_wake(): it gets a reference to
> 'key2', wakes process P, and drops reference to 'key2'.
That's pretty irrelevant as this operation is symetrical.
> Once process P is woken up, it should unqueue, drop reference to 'key2'
> (the one referring to the futex_q, this is done in unqueue_me())
> and to 'key1' (the one referring to futex_wait operation). Without this
> patch it drops reference to 'key2' instead of 'key1'.
I can see the bug, but while the patch fixes it I don't think it is
the proper solution. Aside of that we might have a similar problem in
the futex_wait_requeue_pi() code.
The real underlying problem is, that futex_wait_setup() returns with
two references held in the case of success. That's what needs to be
fixed in the first place.
The futex_wait() case can be fixed with the patch below, still looking
into the futex_wait_requeue_pi() maze.
Darren, this whole key refcounting needs to be simplified _AND_
documented.
Thanks,
tglx
---
Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/futex.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/futex.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1786,8 +1786,14 @@ retry_private:
}
out:
- if (ret)
- put_futex_key(fshared, &q->key);
+ /*
+ * On success we hold here two references acquired in
+ * get_futex_key() and queue_lock(). Drop one.
+ *
+ * On failure we hold one reference acquired in
+ * get_futex_key(). Drop it.
+ */
+ put_futex_key(fshared, &q->key);
return ret;
}
@@ -1819,7 +1825,7 @@ static int futex_wait(u32 __user *uaddr,
}
retry:
- /* Prepare to wait on uaddr. */
+ /* Prepare to wait on uaddr. Hold hb lock and q.key ref on success */
ret = futex_wait_setup(uaddr, val, fshared, &q, &hb);
if (ret)
goto out;
@@ -1829,24 +1835,23 @@ retry:
/* If we were woken (and unqueued), we succeeded, whatever. */
ret = 0;
+ /* unqueue_me() drops q.key ref */
if (!unqueue_me(&q))
- goto out_put_key;
+ goto out;
ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
if (to && !to->task)
- goto out_put_key;
+ goto out;
/*
* We expect signal_pending(current), but we might be the
* victim of a spurious wakeup as well.
*/
- if (!signal_pending(current)) {
- put_futex_key(fshared, &q.key);
+ if (!signal_pending(current))
goto retry;
- }
ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
if (!abs_time)
- goto out_put_key;
+ goto out;
restart = ¤t_thread_info()->restart_block;
restart->fn = futex_wait_restart;
@@ -1863,8 +1868,6 @@ retry:
ret = -ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK;
-out_put_key:
- put_futex_key(fshared, &q.key);
out:
if (to) {
hrtimer_cancel(&to->timer);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-15 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-14 11:30 Louis Rilling
2010-10-15 12:16 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2010-10-15 19:19 ` Darren Hart
2010-10-18 12:14 ` Matthieu Fertré
2010-10-15 19:13 ` Darren Hart
2010-10-15 19:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-10-18 12:51 ` Matthieu Fertré
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1010151228130.2496@localhost6.localdomain6 \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=louis.rilling@kerlabs.com \
--cc=matthieu.fertre@kerlabs.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®