From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755524Ab0JUULe (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:11:34 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:57636 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751403Ab0JUULd (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:11:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 21:56:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Steven Rostedt cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , Koki Sanagi , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Frederic Weisbecker , nhorman@tuxdriver.com, scott.a.mcmillan@intel.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, "H. Peter Anvin" , LKML , eric.dumazet@gmail.com, kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com, David Miller , izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Heiko Carstens , "Luck, Tony" Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Cleanup the convoluted softirq tracepoints In-Reply-To: <1287680725.16971.586.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Message-ID: References: <20100908112529.GA25931@elte.hu> <1287395077.29097.1543.camel@twins> <1287398936.29097.1548.camel@twins> <4CBD79CF.2060706@jp.fujitsu.com> <20101019132236.GA19197@Krystal> <1287496495.16971.372.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20101019142820.GA14520@Krystal> <1287521757.16971.397.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1287523439.16971.433.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1287527634.16971.536.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1287680725.16971.586.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 18:18 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 00:04 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > > > hpa just posted code which does the _RIGHT_ _THING_ independent of any > > > > compiler madness and you tracer folks just missed it. > > > > > > Thomas, > > > > > > Can you try this patch and see if it makes the object code better? > > > > Nope, same result. > > Yeah, I figured. Do you have CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE set? And if you do, > what happens if you disable it? Hmm. Indeed. That gets rid of the double jump. Thanks, tglx