Re: [PATCH] time: jiffies.c: fix typos in comment

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Sat, 23 Oct 2010, Serafeim Zanikolas wrote:

> 
> Signed-off-by: Serafeim Zanikolas <sez@debian.org>
> ---
>  kernel/time/jiffies.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/jiffies.c b/kernel/time/jiffies.c
> index 5404a84..12ba9a7 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/jiffies.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/jiffies.c
> @@ -30,8 +30,8 @@
>   * the timer interrupt frequency HZ and it suffers
>   * inaccuracies caused by missed or lost timer
>   * interrupts and the inability for the timer
> - * interrupt hardware to accuratly tick at the
> - * requested HZ value. It is also not reccomended
> + * interrupt hardware to accurately tick at the
> + * requested HZ value. It is also not recommended
>   * for "tick-less" systems.

You are not only correcting a typo. You are changing the sense of the
comment, unfortunately in the wrong way.

Why wouldn't it be recommended that the interrupt hardware ticks at
the requested HZ value ? 

The inability of it to tick accurately at the requested HZ value is
one of the causes which make jiffies clocksource inaccurate. And that
what the comment says.

Thanks,

	tglx