mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Cc: "gregkh@suse.de" <gregkh@suse.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
	"virtualization@lists.osdl.org" <virtualization@lists.osdl.org>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
	Hank Janssen <hjanssen@microsoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH]: Staging: hv: Allocate the vmbus irq dynamically
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 16:12:27 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1102191540290.2701@localhost6.localdomain6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6E21E5352C11B742B20C142EB499E048011738@TK5EX14MBXC124.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

On Sat, 19 Feb 2011, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@linutronix.de]
> > Please do not use probe_irq_on for dynamic irq allocation. Highjacking
> > the lower PIC irqs is really not a good idea. Depending on when this
> > runs, you might grab an irq required by a driver which gets loaded
> > later.
> > 
> > Could you please explain what you're trying to do here ?
> 
> The IRQ being allocated is for the VMBUS driver for Linux guests running on
> a Windows virtualization platform (Hyper-V hypervisor).
> The hypervisor is capable of notifying events on the VMBUS via
> a guest specified interrupt line. Prior to this patch,
> the code was statically selecting an interrupt line for
> use by VMBUS. One of the long standing review comments
> on  that code was to make this irq allocation dynamic and that
> is what this patch does. For the Linux guest running as a VM
> on Hyper-V, the concern you raise is not an issue.

That patch does a whole lot of useless crap. 

When grabbing some random irq from the PIC is not an issue, then
what's the point of this probing, retry loop and the comments about
racing ? What races here? That does not make sense at all.

I don't know why the previous reviewer wanted to have that
dynamic. That just does not make sense to me.

Btw, that whole interrupt handler with two tasklets, one of them
scheduling work is just screaming threaded interrupt handler.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-19 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-15 19:55 K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-02-18 21:14 ` Greg KH
2011-02-18 22:00   ` KY Srinivasan
2011-02-18 22:07     ` Greg KH
2011-02-18 22:16       ` KY Srinivasan
2011-02-18 22:29         ` Greg KH
2011-02-19  0:56           ` KY Srinivasan
2011-02-19  1:02             ` Greg KH
2011-02-19  1:19               ` KY Srinivasan
2011-02-19 10:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-19 14:34   ` KY Srinivasan
2011-02-19 15:12     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2011-02-19 16:46       ` KY Srinivasan
2011-02-20 16:15         ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-21  3:43           ` KY Srinivasan
2011-02-21  3:50             ` Greg KH
2011-02-21 11:02             ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-21 14:40               ` KY Srinivasan
2011-02-21 14:51                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-21 15:43                   ` Greg KH
2011-02-23 19:16                   ` Greg KH
2011-02-23 19:22                     ` KY Srinivasan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-02-19  1:26 K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-02-15 15:15 [PATCH ]:Staging: " K. Y. Srinivasan
2011-02-15 15:59 ` Greg KH
2011-02-15 16:53   ` KY Srinivasan
2011-02-15 16:59     ` Hank Janssen
2011-02-15 17:22       ` Greg KH
2011-02-15 17:28         ` Hank Janssen
2011-02-15 19:09         ` Hank Janssen
2011-02-15 19:33           ` Greg KH
2011-02-15 17:25     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1102191540290.2701@localhost6.localdomain6 \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
    --cc=hjanssen@microsoft.com \
    --cc=kys@microsoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®