From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755826Ab1CQVio (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:38:44 -0400 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:34471 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755673Ab1CQVin (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:38:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:38:38 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Grant Likely cc: LKML Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] gpio: langwell: Cleanup the interrupt mess In-Reply-To: <20110317195112.GE12824@angua.secretlab.ca> Message-ID: References: <20110317192247.722047296@linutronix.de> <20110317195112.GE12824@angua.secretlab.ca> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Grant Likely wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 07:32:43PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > The langwell interrupt handler is interesting and breaks when an > > architecture enables GENERIC_HARDIRQS_NO_DEPRECATED. > > > > Also this driver along with the other intel ones should depend on x86. > > > > The series cleans that up. The last patch 5/5 is RFC and needs a > > close look and testing by folks at Intel. > > Applied first 4, thanks. Will apply last one when I get acks from the > Intel folks. Fair enough. You should also poke those folks why they did write another driver for the same gpio IP block. Though I wouldn't be surprised if we have more than one copy of this in the tree. :( Thanks, tglx