On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Erik Botö wrote: > When using the pca953x driver (driver/gpio/pca953x.c) I found that the > kernel crashed with the following trace: > > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) > IP: [< (null)>] (null) > *pde = 00000000 > Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP > last sysfs file: /sys/devices/virtual/input/input9/name > Modules linked in: tsc2007 hid_apple usbhid mmci_pci mmc_core adv7180 sta2x11_vip videobuf_dma_contig videobuf_core joydev tc_ivi_i2c_loader stmmac libphy snd_hda_codec_r] > > Pid: 723, comm: kworker/0:1 Not tainted 2.6.37.2-15.1-adaptation-b2 #9 To be filled by O.E.M. To be filled by O.E.M./To be filled by O.E.M. > EIP: 0060:[<00000000>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0 > EIP is at 0x0 > EAX: c16320c0 EBX: c16320c0 ECX: 00000046 EDX: c1650f40 > ESI: c1632104 EDI: 00000008 EBP: ed20bf3c ESP: ed20bf28 > DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0000 SS: 0068 > Process kworker/0:1 (pid: 723, ti=ed20a000 task=ed89e130 > task.ti=ed20a000) > Stack: > c106c3a9 000000cb ed0ae180 c16320c0 00000008 ed20bf5c c115cb77 000000cb > 00000003 c0210000 ed0ae1f4 ec75d440 ee402b40 ed20bf88 c104518d ed20bf88 > ee40007b c115ca44 00000000 ee406a00 ee406a85 ec75d440 ee402b40 c16ec500 > Call Trace: > [] ? handle_edge_irq+0x7b/0x126 > [] ? pca953x_irq_work+0x133/0x164 > [] ? process_one_work+0x1db/0x327 > [] ? pca953x_irq_work+0x0/0x164 > [] ? worker_thread+0x187/0x2a2 > [] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x2a2 > [] ? kthread+0x63/0x68 > [] ? kthread+0x0/0x68 > [] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10 > Code: Bad EIP value. > EIP: [<00000000>] 0x0 SS:ESP 0068:ed20bf28 > CR2: 0000000000000000 > ---[ end trace b7ccc9d6a0ebad9d ]--- > > This crash happens when handle_edge_irq() does not check if there is an > irq_ack before calling it. Other functions in chip.c check for the > existence before calling so I suppose it should be done here as well. Not really. handle_edge_irq calls chip->irq_ack() forever unconditionally because that's how the flow type works. Either that pca* chip sets the wrong flow handler or it lacks the ack function. So no, we don't change the core code for that. Btw, I can't find pca953x_irq_work() in mainline, so I guess it's out of tree. Before it hits the tree it want's to be converted to proper threaded irq handlers as well. Thanks, tglx > Signed-off-by: Erik Botö > Signed-off-by: Richard Röjfors > --- > diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c > index 4af1e2b..dfd852c 100644 > --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c > +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c > @@ -447,7 +447,8 @@ handle_edge_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc) > kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(irq, desc); > > /* Start handling the irq */ > - desc->irq_data.chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data); > + if (desc->irq_data.chip->irq_ack) > + desc->irq_data.chip->irq_ack(&desc->irq_data); > > do { > if (unlikely(!desc->action)) { > >