From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753478Ab1GFOs5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2011 10:48:57 -0400 Received: from mail-vw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.212.46]:43092 "EHLO mail-vw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753304Ab1GFOs4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jul 2011 10:48:56 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 10:37:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home To: Russell King - ARM Linux cc: Arnd Bergmann , "'Daniel Walker'" , "'Jonathan Corbet'" , "'Mel Gorman'" , "'Chunsang Jeong'" , "'Jesse Barker'" , "'KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Michal Nazarewicz'" , linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, "'Kyungmin Park'" , "'Ankita Garg'" , "'Andrew Morton'" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 6/8] drivers: add Contiguous Memory Allocator In-Reply-To: <20110706142345.GC8286@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: References: <1309851710-3828-1-git-send-email-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> <20110705113345.GA8286@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <006301cc3be4$daab1850$900148f0$%szyprowski@samsung.com> <201107061609.29996.arnd@arndb.de> <20110706142345.GC8286@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > Another issue is that when a platform has restricted DMA regions, > they typically don't fall into the highmem zone. As the dmabounce > code allocates from the DMA coherent allocator to provide it with > guaranteed DMA-able memory, that would be rather inconvenient. Do we encounter this in practice i.e. do those platforms requiring large contiguous allocations motivating this work have such DMA restrictions? Nicolas