From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753328Ab1HONXz (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:23:55 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]:54945 "EHLO mail-qw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752633Ab1HONXx (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:23:53 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 09:23:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home To: Arnd Bergmann cc: Leo Yan , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, lkml , Russell King , Haojian Zhuang Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: mmp: add sram allocator In-Reply-To: <1403041.Yj2MdIhcZO@wuerfel> Message-ID: References: <1313377794-26721-1-git-send-email-leoy@marvell.com> <1313377794-26721-2-git-send-email-leoy@marvell.com> <1403041.Yj2MdIhcZO@wuerfel> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 15 Aug 2011, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Some time ago, there was talk of merging the existing sram drivers > and creating a common driver that is easy to hook into. Absolutely. > What has happened with that? My feeling is that we should stop adding > more drivers like this in the platform code but rather put an > authoritative copy into arch/arm/mm/ or even the top-level mm/ directory > and change over the existing drivers to hook into that one. IIRC, this was driven by Russell. Maybe this is a good time to revive discussion around it. Nicolas