From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759104AbZFJUeL (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:34:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755779AbZFJUd6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:33:58 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:48123 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755598AbZFJUd6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:33:58 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:32:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain To: Pekka J Enberg cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, cl@linux-foundation.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, mingo@elte.hu, mpm@selenic.com, npiggin@suse.de, yinghai@kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Early boot SLAB for 2.6.31 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LFD 1184 2008-12-16) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Pekka J Enberg wrote: > > I already have patches for that but they are against the -tip tree so I think > we ought to just merge this series to mainline and fix everything up in > subsystem trees for 2.6.31 proper. Hmm. Are there any reasons why the scheduler fixups can't go in this series? Do they depend on other things in -tip? Linus