From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755159AbZFLQjL (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:39:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751573AbZFLQi5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:38:57 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:34068 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751422AbZFLQi4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:38:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain To: Vegard Nossum cc: Ingo Molnar , Pekka Enberg , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] kmemcheck for mainline In-Reply-To: <20090612132443.GA24002@damson.ad.medicalresearch.no> Message-ID: References: <20090612132443.GA24002@damson.ad.medicalresearch.no> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LFD 1184 2008-12-16) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Vegard Nossum wrote: > > Please consider pulling the kmemcheck tree; No. This seems to be 99% merges o fother branches. I'm no longer pulling from people who can't keep their branches clean and develop without pulling from me every other day, or pulling from other random branches. If it gets that many conflicts, I just don't want to see it - there's something seriously wrong with it. And if you just merge for some random reason, I don't want to pull it either. So in either case, I'm not pulling this. Just _look_ at that gitk thing. It has several stretches of just "Merge branch 'linus' into kmemcheck". WITH NO OTHER DEVELOPMENT IN BETWEEN! This release, I'm only going to pull trees that don't do crazy shit. Linus