From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756002AbZFYS1p (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:27:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753748AbZFYS1f (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:27:35 -0400 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:44536 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752977AbZFYS1f (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:27:35 -0400 Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:26:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain To: Thomas Gleixner cc: Ingo Molnar , "Zhang, Yanmin" , LKML , Peter Zijlstra , Darren Hart Subject: Re: [GIT pull] final futex fixes for 2.6.31 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1245897826.2560.421.camel@ymzhang> <20090625100413.GD29980@elte.hu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LFD 1184 2008-12-16) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > I'm truly embarrassed to ask you to pull the latest futexes-for-linus > git tree from: No problem. It was a harmless bug (at worst we'd do some extra work), and I made the same mistake, so I can't blame you. And I merged Peter's prototype clarification so that next time there will be less reason for this to happen. Linus