From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, arjan@infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cl@linux-foundation.org,
npiggin@suse.de
Subject: Re: upcoming kerneloops.org item: get_page_from_freelist
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:22:25 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906251317570.3605@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906251259430.3605@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Whether these are important to you or not, I dunno. I actually suspect
> that we might want a combination of "high priority + allow memory
> freeing", which would be
>
> #define GFP_CRITICAL (__GFP_HIGH | __GFP_WAIT)
Actually, that doesn't work quite the way I intended.
The current page allocator screws up, and doesn't allow us to do this
(well, you _can_ combine the flags, but they don't mean what they mean on
their own). If you have the WAIT flag set, the page allocator will not set
the ALLOC_HARDER bit, so it turns out that GFP_ATOMIC (__GFP_HIGH on its
own) sometimes actually allows more allocations than the above
GFP_CRITICAL would.
It might make more sense to make a __GFP_WAIT allocation set the
ALLOC_HARDER bit _if_ it repeats. The problem with doing a loop of
allocations outside of the page allocator is that you then miss the
subtlety of "try increasingly harder" that the page allocator internally
does (well, right now, the "increasingly harder" only exists for the
try-to-free path, but we could certainly have it for the try-to-allocate
side too)
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-25 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-24 15:07 Arjan van de Ven
2009-06-24 16:46 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-24 16:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-24 16:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-24 16:56 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-24 17:00 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-24 17:55 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-24 17:53 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-24 18:30 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-24 18:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-24 18:44 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-24 18:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-24 19:12 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-24 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-24 19:06 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-24 19:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-24 19:36 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-24 19:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-24 19:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-24 20:01 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-24 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-24 20:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-24 22:07 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-25 4:05 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-25 13:25 ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-25 18:51 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-25 19:38 ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-25 19:44 ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-25 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-25 20:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-25 20:22 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-06-25 20:36 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-25 20:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-25 22:25 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-26 8:51 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-25 20:18 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-25 20:37 ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-25 21:05 ` Joel Becker
2009-06-25 21:26 ` Andreas Dilger
2009-06-25 22:05 ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-25 22:11 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-26 1:11 ` Theodore Tso
2009-06-26 5:16 ` Pekka J Enberg
2009-06-26 8:56 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-26 8:58 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-06-26 9:07 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-29 21:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-30 7:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-26 14:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-29 21:15 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-29 21:20 ` Eric Sandeen
2009-06-29 22:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-25 19:55 ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-25 20:08 ` Jens Axboe
2009-06-24 21:56 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-25 4:14 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-25 8:21 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-29 15:30 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-29 19:20 ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-30 11:00 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-30 19:35 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-30 20:32 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-30 20:51 ` David Rientjes
2009-07-01 10:22 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-29 23:35 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-30 7:47 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-30 8:13 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-30 8:24 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-30 8:41 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-30 9:09 ` Nick Piggin
2009-06-30 19:47 ` David Rientjes
2009-06-30 6:27 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-28 10:16 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-28 18:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-28 18:27 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-06-28 18:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-30 7:35 ` Pavel Machek
2009-06-24 18:43 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0906251317570.3605@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®