mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: kmemleak: Protect the seq start/next/stop sequence by rcu_read_lock()
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:32:14 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0908120831060.28882@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1250079447.20332.27.camel@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com>



On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> 
> If the object size is bigger than a predefined value (4K in this case),
> release the object lock during scanning and call cond_resched().

What guarantees that the object isn't released during this?

		Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-12 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-07-29 15:26 [PATCH] " Catalin Marinas
2009-07-30  0:00 ` Andrew Morton
2009-07-30  8:24   ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-02 11:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-10 15:55   ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-10 18:45     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-10 22:56       ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-11  7:32         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-11  8:55           ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-12 12:17             ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-12 15:32               ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-08-12 15:39                 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-12 20:52               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-12 22:16                 ` kmemleak: Protect the seq start/next/stop sequence byrcu_read_lock() Catalin Marinas
2009-08-13  6:52                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-13  9:39                     ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-13  9:44                       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-13 14:44                         ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-14 22:45                 ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-14 22:47                   ` [PATCH] kmemleak: Allow rescheduling during an object scanning Catalin Marinas
2009-08-14 22:48                   ` [PATCH] kmemleak: Ignore the aperture memory hole on x86_64 Catalin Marinas
2009-08-15 14:17                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-15 22:34                       ` Catalin Marinas
2009-08-16  7:04                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-16 10:08                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-16 21:48                       ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0908120831060.28882@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®