From: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] bind/unbind uevent
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 18:29:37 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1012071814160.1998@localhost6.localdomain6> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101207162755.GA32328@suse.de>
On Tue, 7 Dec 2010, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:18:27PM +0100, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There is currently no generic trigger for userspace to know when a driver
> > is bound to a device.
>
> Not true at all, you get one when a device is attached to a bus. What's
> wrong with that notification?
we get a KOBJ_ADD if a device is attached to a bus, but this does not
imply that a device driver is bound to this device
>
> > Such a trigger may be required in cases where setup
> > steps must be performed in userspace after the device is bound, e.g.
> > because the driver adds sysfs attributes in its probe function.
>
> A driver should not add sysfs attributes in its probe function as that
> is racy as you have noticed. Add the attributes in the bus functions
> for that driver and it should be fine.
sry..I was not clear on this one. I was talking driver specific
attributes per device. So I'm searching for a trigger when these
attributes are created, or in other words when the device is useable,
which I think translates to when a driver is bound to this device.
>
> > I can imagine 3 possible ways to solve this problem:
> > * add a bus specific change event (triggered by BUS_NOTIFY_BOUND_DRIVER)
> > - this may result in duplicated code for each bus
> > * dissable autoprobing and "manually" probe the device from userspace
> > triggered by the add event - this duplicates logic already implemented
> > in the kernel
> > * add a generic bind/unbind uevent
> >
> > Which one is preferred from a driver core perspective?
>
> None, use the existing notifications like everyone else :)
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-07 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-07 16:18 Sebastian Ott
2010-12-07 16:27 ` Greg KH
2010-12-07 17:29 ` Sebastian Ott [this message]
2010-12-07 18:33 ` Greg KH
2010-12-07 19:00 ` Kay Sievers
2010-12-08 10:18 ` Sebastian Ott
2010-12-08 16:02 ` Greg KH
2010-12-13 19:27 ` Sebastian Ott
2010-12-13 19:36 ` Greg KH
2010-12-14 18:26 ` Sebastian Ott
2010-12-14 19:29 ` Greg KH
2010-12-15 13:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2010-12-15 16:23 ` Greg KH
2010-12-15 17:35 ` Cornelia Huck
2010-12-15 17:51 ` Kay Sievers
2010-12-15 18:08 ` Cornelia Huck
2010-12-15 18:18 ` Greg KH
2010-12-16 10:22 ` Cornelia Huck
2010-12-08 10:16 ` Sebastian Ott
2010-12-08 16:01 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1012071814160.1998@localhost6.localdomain6 \
--to=sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®