From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755131Ab1AJXBM (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:01:12 -0500 Received: from vms173009pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.9]:64140 "EHLO vms173009pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754960Ab1AJXBJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:01:09 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 18:01:01 -0500 (EST) From: Len Brown X-X-Sender: lenb@x980 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: LKML , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux-pm mailing list , Andrew Morton , Thomas Renninger Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Make cpuidle_enable_device() call poll_idle_init() In-reply-to: <201101080029.20744.rjw@sisk.pl> Message-id: References: <201101080029.20744.rjw@sisk.pl> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > /** > * cpuidle_enable_device - enables idle PM for a CPU > * @dev: the CPU > @@ -176,6 +215,8 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle > ret = __cpuidle_register_device(dev); > if (ret) > return ret; > + } else { > + poll_idle_init(dev); > } how about calling poll_idle_init() unconditionally here and deleting the call to it from within __cpuidle_register_device()? thanks, Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center