From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@google.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace: Add special x86 irq entry/exit tracepoints
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:14:30 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1104290158320.3005@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303512981-26234-1-git-send-email-vnagarnaik@google.com>
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Vaibhav Nagarnaik wrote:
> #include <asm/perf_event.h>
> #include <asm/x86_init.h>
> @@ -857,7 +858,9 @@ void __irq_entry smp_apic_timer_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
> */
> exit_idle();
> irq_enter();
> + trace_special_irq_entry(LOCAL_TIMER_VECTOR);
Gah. trace_special_irq is the worst name you could come up with. It's
tracing a vector which is nothing special and nothing x86 specific.
> #include <asm/vsyscall.h>
> #include <asm/x86_init.h>
> @@ -26,6 +27,8 @@
> volatile unsigned long __jiffies __section_jiffies = INITIAL_JIFFIES;
> #endif
>
> +static struct irqaction *irq0_action;
> +
Ouch! You need an extra pointer for that ? Moving the stupid irq0
struct up a few lines would do the trick as well, right ?
> --- a/include/trace/events/irq.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/irq.h
> @@ -139,6 +139,74 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(softirq, softirq_raise,
> TP_ARGS(vec_nr)
> );
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86
> +#include <asm/irq_vectors.h>
> +#define special_irq_name(sirq) { sirq, #sirq }
> +#define show_special_irq_name(val) \
> + __print_symbolic(val, \
> + special_irq_name(NMI_VECTOR), \
> + special_irq_name(LOCAL_TIMER_VECTOR), \
> + special_irq_name(ERROR_APIC_VECTOR), \
> + special_irq_name(RESCHEDULE_VECTOR), \
> + special_irq_name(CALL_FUNCTION_VECTOR), \
> + special_irq_name(CALL_FUNCTION_SINGLE_VECTOR), \
> + special_irq_name(THERMAL_APIC_VECTOR), \
> + special_irq_name(THRESHOLD_APIC_VECTOR), \
> + special_irq_name(REBOOT_VECTOR), \
> + special_irq_name(SPURIOUS_APIC_VECTOR), \
> + special_irq_name(IRQ_WORK_VECTOR), \
> + special_irq_name(X86_PLATFORM_IPI_VECTOR) \
> + )
> +
> +#define IS_INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR(__irq) (\
> + __irq >= INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR_START && \
> + __irq <= INVALIDATE_TLB_VECTOR_END)
No way, really.
Interrupt vectors are not x86 specific and they do no need any
architecture specific handling at all.
The symbolic printout is a nice to have extra, but it can be solved by
providing an arch specific lookup table which does not require any of
that #ifdef X86 mess. If the table does not exist, then you simply can
print the vector number and be done with it.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-22 22:56 Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-04-25 23:41 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-04-28 23:16 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-04-28 23:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-04-29 20:12 ` [PATCH] trace: Add x86 irq vector " Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-04-29 20:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-04-29 22:04 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-05-31 21:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-06-01 0:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-01 22:38 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-06-01 23:30 ` David Sharp
2011-06-16 3:02 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-21 18:43 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-07-06 23:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-06 23:56 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-07 0:02 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-07 0:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-07 0:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2011-07-07 0:51 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-07 9:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-07-07 22:50 ` David Sharp
2011-07-07 23:00 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-06-21 18:45 ` [PATCH v3] " Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-07-06 21:50 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-07-06 23:38 ` Andi Kleen
2011-07-07 23:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-08 0:54 ` David Sharp
2011-07-11 15:54 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-11 18:21 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-07-12 18:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-12 22:08 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-07-13 14:11 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-13 18:18 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-04-29 0:14 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2011-04-29 20:15 ` [PATCH] trace: Add special x86 irq " Vaibhav Nagarnaik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1104290158320.3005@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=dhsharp@google.com \
--cc=jiayingz@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mrubin@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vnagarnaik@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome