From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@google.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Aditya Kali <adityakali@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Change trap definitions to enumerated values
Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 01:06:25 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1105060053320.3005@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin3_xWVZVcvz81+t=A+hjjf+7KfCw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, 5 May 2011, Vaibhav Nagarnaik wrote:
> Steven
>
> This patch has the formatting as you suggested. Does this work for you?
>
> Thomas
>
> Can you please take a look at the patches and provide your comments?
Can you please stop that nonsense ?
You posted the patch on Tuesday, sent a reminder on Wednesday and
another one on Thursday.
Do you really think that I'm a robot waiting for your patches to
magically surface on LKML and then dropping any other activity to take
care of them ?
I have seen that patch and it's in my list to take care of, just not a
top priority level issue. It's neither a bug fix nor anything which
radically improves the kernel. So what?
I don't mind a polite reminder after a week or two in case I actually
missed a patch, but that daily reminder is just a PITA.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-05 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-03 22:49 Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-05-04 21:25 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-05-05 21:36 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-05-05 23:06 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2011-06-13 23:29 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
2011-06-15 15:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-27 20:38 ` Vaibhav Nagarnaik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1105060053320.3005@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=adityakali@google.com \
--cc=dhsharp@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mrubin@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vnagarnaik@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome