From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756922Ab1EYWyU (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2011 18:54:20 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:40847 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755914Ab1EYWyT (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2011 18:54:19 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 00:54:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Steven Rostedt cc: LKML , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , "paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , Witold Baryluk , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ftrace: Add internal recursive checks In-Reply-To: <1306355009.1465.119.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Message-ID: References: <1306348063.1465.116.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1306355009.1465.119.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 25 May 2011, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 20:57 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Wed, 25 May 2011, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > + > > > + /* Only current can touch these values */ > > > +#define trace_recursion_inc() (current)->trace_recursion++ > > > +#define trace_recursion_dec() (current)->trace_recursion-- > > > + /* Ring buffer has the 10 LSB bits to count */ > > > +#define trace_recursion_buffer() ((current)->trace_recursion & 0x3ff) > > > +#define TRACE_INTERNAL_BIT (1<<11) > > > +#define TRACE_GLOBAL_BIT (1<<12) > > > +#define trace_recursion_set(bit) (current)->trace_recursion |= (bit) > > > +#define trace_recursion_clear(bit) (current)->trace_recursion &= ~(bit) > > > +#define trace_recursion_test(bit) ((current)->trace_recursion & (bit)) > > > + > > > #endif /* CONFIG_TRACING */ > > > > Bah, these are only used in kernel/trace/. So can you please add them > > to a kernel/trace local header file instead of cramming it mindlessly > > into task_struct just because you're lazy? > > Actually the lazy thing to do was to include it only in > kernel/trace/trace.h BUT... > > Any user of the function tracer (callbacks) may need to do the same > thing, because the callbacks could be called without going though the > list lookup and may need their own bit set. Errm, what means _MAY_? There are no users outside of kernel/trace/ for this right now. Are you saying that you forgot to update some code or is this about random out of tree users? Thanks, tglx