From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752195Ab1GMVof (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:44:35 -0400 Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.5]:61491 "EHLO vms173005pub.verizon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751383Ab1GMVoe (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:44:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 16:44:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Len Brown X-X-Sender: lenb@x980 To: Ingo Molnar Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Alan Cox , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86 intel power: Initialize MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS In-reply-to: <20110415101712.GB28007@elte.hu> Message-id: References: <20110414090854.GB9248@elte.hu> <20110415101712.GB28007@elte.hu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > So how about informing users, how about making it non-silent? An informative > printk that also mentions the power configuration tool, etc. This solves the > concerns i mentioned. Something like this? rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS, epb); if ((epb & 0xF) == 0) { printk_once(KERN_WARN, "x86: updated energy_perf_bias" " to 'normal' from 'performance'\n" "You can view and update epb via utility," " such as x86_energy_perf_policy(8)\n"); epb = (epb & ~0xF) | ENERGY_PERF_BIAS_NORMAL; wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS, epb); }