From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751350Ab1GWHbm (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jul 2011 03:31:42 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:52123 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750772Ab1GWHbf (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jul 2011 03:31:35 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 09:31:33 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Rolando Martins cc: LKML , linux-rt-users Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.0-rt1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 22 Jul 2011, Rolando Martins wrote: > Thanks for the great work! > > Is it possible to have RT_GROUP_SCHED and PREEMPT_RT_FULL? Not at the momenent. RT_GROUP_SCHED depends on !PREEMPT_RT_FULL because it leads to yet undebugged hangs and failures. Thanks, tglx