mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clockevents: Use an atomic RCU notifier for clockevents
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 01:19:06 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1109070113090.2723@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110906224228.GA5534@alboin.fm.intel.com>

On Tue, 6 Sep 2011, Andi Kleen wrote:

> > The idle code, at least the one in drivers/idle/intel_idle.c, does
> > _NOT_ call into that code at all when a reliable lapic timer is
> > available:
> 
> But the ACPI idle doesn't check that, so it still has a scalability problem.
> 
> Hmm ok so could add that check into acpi idle too I guess, but then ACPI
> idle doesn't normally know anything about CPUs.
> 
> > Either you are using different code or your machine does not have that
> > ARAT flag set.
> 
> The second test was using ACPI idle.

And as I said in that very same mail:

> > Same applies for drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c

lapic_timer_check_state()
{
       if (cpu_has(&cpu_data(pr->id), X86_FEATURE_ARAT))
                return;
....

WTF are you talking about? 

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-06 23:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-29 21:08 Andi Kleen
2011-08-29 21:08 ` [PATCH 2/3] broadcast-tick: Move oneshot broadcast mask to per cpu variables v2 Andi Kleen
2011-09-06 15:28   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-08-29 21:08 ` [PATCH 3/3] tick-broadcast: push down tick_broadcast_lock Andi Kleen
2011-09-06 16:19   ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-06 17:49     ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-06 18:55       ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] clockevents: Use an atomic RCU notifier for clockevents Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-06 20:33   ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-06 21:45     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-06 22:42       ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-06 23:19         ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-26 22:32 Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1109070113090.2723@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome