From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: akpm@google.com
Cc: cschan@codeaurora.org, john.stultz@linaro.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] kernel/timer.c: use debugobjects to catch deletion of uninitialized timers
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:50:48 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1109211028060.2723@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201109202114.p8KLErtg011804@hpaq2.eem.corp.google.com>
Christine,
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011, akpm@google.com wrote:
> From: Christine Chan <cschan@codeaurora.org>
> Subject: kernel/timer.c: use debugobjects to catch deletion of uninitialized timers
>
> del_timer_sync() calls debug_object_assert_init() to assert that a timer
> has been initialized before calling lock_timer_base(). lock_timer_base()
> would spin forever on a NULL(uninit-ed) base. The check is added to
> del_timer() to prevent silent failure, even though it would not get stuck
> in an infinite loop.
Ok, that makes sense, but the changelog of the debugobjects code wants
a better explanation.
> +/*
> + * fixup_assert_init is called when:
> + * - an untracked/uninit-ed object is found
> + */
> +static int timer_fixup_assert_init(void *addr, enum debug_obj_state state)
> +{
> + struct timer_list *timer = addr;
> +
> + switch (state) {
> + case ODEBUG_STATE_NOTAVAILABLE:
> + if (timer->entry.prev == TIMER_ENTRY_STATIC) {
> + /*
> + * This is not really a fixup. The timer was
> + * statically initialized. We just make sure that it
> + * is tracked in the object tracker.
> + */
> + debug_object_init(timer, &timer_debug_descr);
> + return 0;
> + } else {
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + init_timer(timer);
> + return 1;
Can we please remove the WARN_ON() and use the return value in the
debugobjects code? That needs a variant of debug_print_object() to give us
proper state output.
Also the fixup function should check for timer->function == NULL and
set a default stub callback.
Thinking more about that, we should do the same for the
timer_fixup_activate() case.
Can you have a stab at that, please?
Thanks,
tglx
parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-21 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <201109202114.p8KLErtg011804@hpaq2.eem.corp.google.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1109211028060.2723@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@google.com \
--cc=cschan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®