From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751437Ab1JMUMo (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:12:44 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:43646 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751301Ab1JMUMn (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:12:43 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 22:12:40 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Grant Likely cc: Rob Herring , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base In-Reply-To: <20111013193347.GB18574@ponder.secretlab.ca> Message-ID: References: <20111004233953.GE3009@ponder.secretlab.ca> <1317783380-773-1-git-send-email-robherring2@gmail.com> <4E944242.10606@gmail.com> <20111013193347.GB18574@ponder.secretlab.ca> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Grant Likely wrote: > Thomas, any objection to this patch? It's entirely contained within > the irq_domain stuff, so it is pretty well isolated. > > It can be merged via arm-soc since it is depended on by some of the > irq work. Acked-by-me