From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751613Ab1KGGpo (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2011 01:45:44 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:41895 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750816Ab1KGGpm (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2011 01:45:42 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2011 08:45:32 +0200 (EET) From: Pekka Enberg X-X-Sender: penberg@tux.localdomain To: Anthony Liguori cc: Pekka Enberg , "kvm@vger.kernel.org list" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List" , qemu-devel Developers , Alexander Graf , Blue Swirl , Avi Kivity , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Am=E9rico_Wang?= , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels In-Reply-To: <4EB7368D.1080003@codemonkey.ws> Message-ID: References: <1320543320-32728-1-git-send-email-agraf@suse.de> <4EB65C5B.8070709@redhat.com> <4EB66036.4080102@redhat.com> <1320577728.1428.73.camel@jaguar> <4EB67486.1070105@redhat.com> <4EB67D17.7000701@redhat.com> <4EB680D9.2070706@redhat.com> <4EB6AE34.2000907@redhat.com> <4EB6BAED.2030400@redhat.com> <4EB6BEFA.6000303@codemonkey.ws> <4EB7368D.1080003@codemonkey.ws> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Anthony, On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Anthony Liguori wrote: > - Drop SDL/VNC. Make a proper Cairo GUI with a full blown GTK interface. > Don't rely on virt-manager for this. Not that I have anything against > virt-manager but there are many layers between you and the end GUI if you go > that route. Funny that you should mention this. It was actually what I started out with. I went for SDL because it was a low-hanging fruit after the VNC patches which I didn't do myself. However, it was never figured out if there was going to be a virtio transport for GPU commands: http://lwn.net/Articles/408831/ On Sun, 6 Nov 2011, Anthony Liguori wrote: > - Sandbox the device model from day #1. The size of the Linux kernel > interface is pretty huge and as a hypervisor, it's the biggest place for > improvement from a security perspective. We're going to do sandboxing in > QEMU, but it's going to be difficult. It would be much easier for you given > where you're at. Completely agreed. I think Sasha is actually starting to work on this. See the "Secure KVM" thread on kvm@. Pekka