From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755623Ab1LDUqf (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:46:35 -0500 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:52853 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755335Ab1LDUqe (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Dec 2011 15:46:34 -0500 Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 21:46:31 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Tim Sander cc: Steven Rostedt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rt-users , Carsten Emde , John Kacur Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] [ANNOUNCE] 3.0.12-rt30-rc2 In-Reply-To: <201112042113.37047.tim01@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> Message-ID: References: <20111204185444.411298317@goodmis.org> <201112042113.37047.tim01@vlsi.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 4 Dec 2011, Tim Sander wrote: > Hi Steven > > This is the RT stable review cycle of patch 3.0.12-rt30-rc2. > > > > Please scream at me if I messed something up. Please test the patches too. > Ok, this is a nearly blind shot, but i was expieriencing strange idle time > behaviour with this Ingo Molnar patch. The idle time was never incremented as > read from /proc/stat for several minutes. The system itself was behaving fine > and had definetly not 100% load which was also verified with top. Did some other time accounting increase instead ?