From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755800Ab2BAIS4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 03:18:56 -0500 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:42590 "EHLO mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753793Ab2BAISz (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 03:18:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:18:48 +0200 (EET) From: Pekka Enberg X-X-Sender: penberg@tux.localdomain To: Paolo Bonzini cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-scsi , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , Rusty Russell , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] virtio-scsi driver In-Reply-To: <4F28F42A.1050103@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <1327077939-7084-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <4F26596B.6030703@redhat.com> <4F28F42A.1050103@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 1 Feb 2012, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> Have the virtio specification changes been reviewed? Can we guarantee >> stable ABI for the virtio-scsi driver? > > Of course. I would have proposed it for staging otherwise. I'm not a SCSI expert but FWIW I went through the patches and I think they're definitely worthwhile having in mainline for v3.4: Acked-by: Pekka Enberg Pekka