From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758667Ab2CFI2g (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 6 Mar 2012 03:28:36 -0500
Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:56757 "EHLO
	Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757934Ab2CFI2e (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 6 Mar 2012 03:28:34 -0500
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 09:28:30 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
cc: Stefan Lippers-Hollmann <s.L-H@gmx.de>, Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        stable@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>,
        linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ 57/72] genirq: Unmask oneshot irqs when thread was not woken
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxZsVxkxifR+EUZi=RsUGKfs5vYXX3nN_M_Az1BY5yyaw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203060927190.2742@ionos>
References: <20120228010511.GA8453@kroah.com> <20120228010434.412979550@linuxfoundation.org> <87hay4dqjr.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <201203050143.24541.s.L-H@gmx.de> <CA+55aFxZsVxkxifR+EUZi=RsUGKfs5vYXX3nN_M_Az1BY5yyaw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0
X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: -
X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required,  ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> Thomas, should we just plan on reverting that commit from mainline? It
> clearly causes regressions.

Give me a day or two to figure out why it breaks stuff. I have no idea
why it should wreckage anything.

Thanks,

	tglx