From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759633Ab2CUCYD (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:24:03 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:35985 "EHLO mail-qc0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759240Ab2CUCYB (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:24:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 22:23:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Amit Kucheria cc: Kevin Hilman , Arnd Bergmann , Robert Lee , len.brown@intel.com, Andrew Morton , rjw@sisk.pl, robherring2@gmail.com, Baohua.Song@csr.com, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux@maxim.org.za, kgene.kim@samsung.com, amit.kachhap@linaro.org, magnus.damm@gmail.com, nsekhar@ti.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, mturquette@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com, Russell King - ARM Linux , jean.pihet@newoldbits.com, venki@google.com, ccross@google.com, g.trinabh@gmail.com, kernel@wantstofly.org, lethal@linux-sh.org, jon-hunter@ti.com, tony@atomide.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Consolidate cpuidle functionality In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1332274969-15782-1-git-send-email-rob.lee@linaro.org> <201203202158.08042.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> <873992zy5u.fsf@ti.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="8323328-1729038486-1332296636=:24151" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323328-1729038486-1332296636=:24151 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, Amit Kucheria wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: > > Maybe it's time that drivers/cpuidle gets a maintainer.  With lots of > > discussions of scheduler changes that affect load estimation, I suspect > > we're all going to have a bit of CPUidle work to do in the > > not-so-distant future. > > > > I don't mean to be piling on to Len here, but Daniel Lezcano too has a > bunch of clean ups that didn't get any maintainer review for over two > months. He has now refreshed them for 3.3 and is getting ready to send > them out again. We (Linaro) expect to be spending a lot of time on > cpuidle in the future and would be glad to help review, test and > collect patches into a tree for Linus/Andrew to pull while we wait for > Len to respond or another maintainer to emerge. As I advised recently, it is usually a good idea for the person/group who is working the most on a subsystem to simply take the lead and become the new maintainer. Waiting for another maintainer to emerge could be compared to cowardice. Nicolas --8323328-1729038486-1332296636=:24151--