From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fix idle ticks in cpu summary line of /proc/stat
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 12:42:22 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1203291241360.2542@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120313080748.GA7754@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Michal Hocko wrote:
> OK, so the updated version of the patch looks like this. I am sorry but
> I had time to only compile test this...
> ---
> >From d12247f14c5f8b00ae97a87442f62e49227a759b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
> Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 13:11:38 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] nohz: fix idle ticks in cpu summary line of /proc/stat
>
> Git commit 09a1d34f8535ecf9 "nohz: Make idle/iowait counter update
> conditional" introduced a bug in regard to cpu hotplug. The effect is
> that the number of idle ticks in the cpu summary line in /proc/stat is
> still counting ticks for offline cpus.
>
> Reproduction is easy, just start a workload that keeps all cpus busy,
> switch off one or more cpus and then watch the idle field in top.
> On a dual-core with one cpu 100% busy and one offline cpu you will get
> something like this:
>
> %Cpu(s): 48.7 us, 1.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 50.0 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.0 si, 0.0 st
>
> The problem is that an offline cpu still has ts->idle_active == 1.
> To fix this we should make sure that the cpu is online when calling
> get_cpu_idle_time_us and get_cpu_iowait_time_us.
>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Reported-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Martin, does that solve the problem for you ?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-29 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-11 22:26 [PATCH] " Martin Schwidefsky
2012-03-12 12:17 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-12 14:17 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-03-12 14:48 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-12 15:39 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-12 20:41 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-03-13 8:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Michal Hocko
2012-03-13 8:32 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-07-18 11:52 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-07-18 12:21 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-29 10:42 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2012-03-30 10:23 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2012-03-30 10:41 ` Michal Hocko
2012-03-30 11:01 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-03-30 13:58 ` [tip:timers/core] proc: stats: Use arch_idle_time for idle and iowait times if available tip-bot for Martin Schwidefsky
2012-03-30 22:54 ` Andrew Morton
2012-04-02 6:51 ` Martin Schwidefsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1203291241360.2542@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome