From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
svenjoac@gmx.de, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/urgent] tick: Fix oneshot broadcast setup really
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:31:58 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1204181723350.2542@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F8ECD39.3080900@ti.com>
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 April 2012 06:49 PM, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 5:37 PM, tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
> > <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >> Commit-ID: b435092f70ec5ebbfb6d075d5bf3c631b49a51de
> >> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/b435092f70ec5ebbfb6d075d5bf3c631b49a51de
> >> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> >> AuthorDate: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:08:23 +0200
> >> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> >> CommitDate: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:00:56 +0200
> >>
> >> tick: Fix oneshot broadcast setup really
> >>
> >> Sven Joachim reported, that suspend/resume on rc3 trips over a NULL
> >> pointer dereference. Linus spotted the clockevent handler being NULL.
> >>
> >> commit fa4da365b(clockevents: tTack broadcast device mode change in
> >> tick_broadcast_switch_to_oneshot()) tried to fix a problem with the
> >> broadcast device setup, which was introduced in commit 77b0d60c5(
> >> clockevents: Leave the broadcast device in shutdown mode when not
> >> needed).
> >>
> >> The initial commit avoided to set up the broadcast device when no
> >> broadcast request bits were set, but that left the broadcast device
> >> disfunctional. In consequence deep idle states which need the
> >> broadcast device were not woken up.
> >>
> >> commit fa4da365b tried to fix that by initializing the state of the
> >> broadcast facility, but that missed the fact, that nothing initializes
> >> the event handler and some other state of the underlying clock event
> >> device.
> >>
> >> The fix is to revert both commits and make only the mode setting of
> >> the clock event device conditional on the state of active broadcast
> >> users.
> >>
> >> That initializes everything except the low level device mode, but this
> >> happens when the broadcast functionality is invoked by deep idle.
> >>
> >> Reported-and-tested-by: Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> >> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> >> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
> >> Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
> >> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LFD.2.02.1204181205540.2542@ionos
> >>
> >> ---
> >> kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 7 +------
> >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> >> index bf57abd..119aca5 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
> >> @@ -531,7 +531,6 @@ void tick_broadcast_setup_oneshot(struct clock_event_device *bc)
> >> int was_periodic = bc->mode == CLOCK_EVT_MODE_PERIODIC;
> >>
> >> bc->event_handler = tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast;
> >> - clockevents_set_mode(bc, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT);
> >>
> >> /* Take the do_timer update */
> >> tick_do_timer_cpu = cpu;
> >> @@ -549,6 +548,7 @@ void tick_broadcast_setup_oneshot(struct clock_event_device *bc)
> >> to_cpumask(tmpmask));
> >>
> >> if (was_periodic && !cpumask_empty(to_cpumask(tmpmask))) {
> >> + clockevents_set_mode(bc, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT);
>
> For some reason above if() check fails in my case, so broadcast device
> never set to ONESHOT mode. That explains the problem I am seeing on
> OMAP with the $subject patch. At this point of time bc->mode is
> CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED.
Darn, crap. I wonder how that works on x86
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
index bf57abd..e8f5479 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
@@ -373,6 +373,9 @@ static int tick_broadcast_set_event(ktime_t expires, int force)
{
struct clock_event_device *bc = tick_broadcast_device.evtdev;
+ if (bc->mode != CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT)
+ clockevents_set_mode(bc, CLOCK_EVT_MODE_ONESHOT);
+
return clockevents_program_event(bc, expires, force);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-18 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-16 1:49 Linux 3.4-rc3 Linus Torvalds
2012-04-17 15:24 ` kernel panic after suspend/resume (was: Linux 3.4-rc3) Sven Joachim
2012-04-17 16:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-17 18:12 ` kernel panic after suspend/resume Sven Joachim
2012-04-17 19:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-17 22:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-18 5:27 ` Sven Joachim
2012-04-17 21:21 ` kernel panic after suspend/resume (was: Linux 3.4-rc3) Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-18 8:22 ` kernel panic after suspend/resume Sven Joachim
2012-04-18 9:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-04-18 10:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-18 11:03 ` Sven Joachim
2012-04-18 12:07 ` [tip:timers/urgent] tick: Fix oneshot broadcast setup really tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-18 13:19 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-04-18 14:18 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-04-18 15:31 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2012-04-18 15:51 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-04-19 2:27 ` Suresh Siddha
2012-04-19 8:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-19 10:14 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2012-04-19 10:37 ` Sven Joachim
2012-04-19 19:38 ` [tip:timers/urgent] tick: Fix the spurious broadcast timer ticks after resume tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2012-04-19 19:37 ` [tip:timers/urgent] tick: Ensure that the broadcast device is initialized tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1204181723350.2542@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=svenjoac@gmx.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome