From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Paul Bolle" <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
"Andi Kleen" <ak@linux.intel.com>,
"Matthew Garrett" <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
"Jörg Otte" <jrg.otte@googlemail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Len Brown" <lenb@kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: [v3.4-rc1] ACPI regression bisected
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:25:26 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1204182124230.2542@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFyHgQ8QgfLKaCaAJ2gLMrOkFMkQBtt4Bfo=dOzzxSpGHw@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 3:29 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> > Linus, can you please apply directly?
>
> Applied. Can we perhaps also make request_threaded_irq() noisily
> reject things that are not marked IRQF_ONESHOT and have a NULL
> low-level handler?
Yes, it's on my (ever growing) todo list.
> That still allows people to do IRQF_SHARED | IRQF_ONESHOT, and that
> won't be rejected until somebody else actually tries to share it. Then
> it breaks that somebody else ;(
>
> Sadly, that would tend to break fairly silently.
>
> I wonder if we should make the mismatch error printout be
> unconditional (and make just the "dump_stack()" part be conditional on
> CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ)?
That's my plan.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-18 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-02 15:05 Jörg Otte
2012-04-02 23:54 ` Andi Kleen
2012-04-03 8:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-12 8:35 ` Jörg Otte
2012-04-12 8:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-12 11:42 ` Paul Bolle
2012-04-12 17:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-12 21:52 ` Paul Bolle
2012-04-12 14:29 ` Matthew Garrett
2012-04-12 17:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-12 17:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-12 19:26 ` Andi Kleen
2012-04-12 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-18 9:25 ` Paul Bolle
2012-04-18 10:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-18 11:07 ` Paul Bolle
2012-04-18 17:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2012-04-18 19:25 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2012-04-19 9:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-03 9:13 ` Jörg Otte
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1204182124230.2542@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jrg.otte@googlemail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome