From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757734Ab2EGTOJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2012 15:14:09 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:41647 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757711Ab2EGTOG (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2012 15:14:06 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 21:14:04 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: "Paul E. McKenney" cc: LKML Subject: Re: [patch 03/18] fork: Move thread info gfp flags to header In-Reply-To: <20120507043401.GA5406@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Message-ID: References: <20120505150007.543515803@linutronix.de> <20120505150141.428211694@linutronix.de> <20120507043401.GA5406@linux.vnet.ibm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 6 May 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 03:05:41PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > These flags can be useful for extra allocations outside of the core > > code. > > > > Add __GFP_NOTRACE to them, so the archs which have kmemcheck do > > not have to provide extra allocators just for that reason. > > This breaks powerpc builds due to __GFP_NOTRACE not being defined. > I restarted the test after removing the __GFP_NOTRACE as a testing-only > hack, and will let you know how it goes. Also looking into why this > builds on 32-bit x86 but not on powerpc. Hrmpf. Seems the idiot I am fatfingered __GFP_NOTRACK to __GFP_NOTRACE and then only tested with the DEBUG stuff disabled......