On Fri, 25 May 2012, Chen Gong wrote:

> 于 2012/5/25 14:24, Borislav Petkov 写道:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 05:54:52PM +0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> Intentionally left blank to be filled out by someone who wants
> >> that and can explain the reason for this better than me.
> > 
> > That'll be Intel folk :)
> > 
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > 
> > Looks good to me too, thanks Thomas for doing this!
> > 
> > I'll run it next week just in case.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
> > 
> 
> Oh, Oh, wait. First I need to thank Thomas to improve it. I don't
> reply you at the first time because I have some thoughts and now
> I'm testing it. The basic test shows it hangs the system after
> sb_edac is removed and when error count increases to the threshold
> it hangs again, and when trying to reboot the system no hang happnes
> (not reach the threshold) the system oops. I need to time to debug
> and give the valid feedback. Please be patient :-). Of course,

As I said it's completely untested. I just made sure it compiles :)