From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
tony.luck@intel.com, bp@amd64.org, x86@kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/2] x86: mce: Implement cmci poll mode for intel machines
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 11:18:53 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1206061056520.3086@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FCF0500.9050704@linux.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1968 bytes --]
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Chen Gong wrote:
> 于 2012/6/5 21:35, Thomas Gleixner 写道:
> I add some print in timer callback, it shows:
>
> smp_processor_id() = 0, mce_timer_fn data(CPU id) = 10
> timer->function = ffffffff8102c200, timer pending = 1, CPU = 0
> (add_timer_on, BUG!!!)
Sure. That's not a surprise. The timer function for cpu 10 is called
on cpu 0. And the timer function does:
struct timer_list *t = &__get_cpu_var(mce_timer);
which gets a pointer to the timer of cpu0. And that timer is
pending. So yes, it's exploding for a good reason.
Though, this does not tell us how the timer of cpu10 gets on cpu0.
Did you do any cpu hotplug operations ?
> > @@ -1305,13 +1305,14 @@ void mce_timer_kick(unsigned long interv
> > unsigned long when = jiffies + interval;
> > unsigned long iv = __this_cpu_read(mce_next_interval);
> >
> > - if (time_before(when, t->expires) && timer_pending(t)) {
> > - mod_timer(t, when);
> > - } else if (!mce_next_interval) {
> > - t->expires = round_jiffies(jiffies + iv);
> > + if (timer_pending(t)) {
> > + if (time_before(when, t->expires))
> > + mod_timer(t, when);
> > + } else {
> > + t->expires = round_jiffies(jiffies + when);
>
> should be "t->expires = round_jiffies(when);"
True.
> > add_timer_on(t, smp_processor_id());
> > }
> > - if (interval < iv)
> > + if (interval > iv)
> > __this_cpu_write(mce_next_interval, iv);
> > }
> >
> Strange, anyway, mce_next_interval should be updated in proper way, but
> if using above logic, mce_next_interval doesn't make change. I prefer
> if (interval < iv)
> __this_cpu_write(mce_next_interval, interval);
Grr. you are right. Stupid me.
> In fact, during my test, I wrote the similar codes to do the test, but
> it can't fix the bug. The logic here is not the key, no matter how you set
> timer, you can get a poll timer. The issue happens in the timer function
> itself. Once timer callback is entered, the issue happens every time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-06 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-24 17:54 [patch 0/2] x86: mce: Implement poll mode for CMCI Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-24 17:54 ` [patch 1/2] x86: mce Cleanup timer mess Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-25 6:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-04 2:22 ` Chen Gong
2012-06-04 18:14 ` Luck, Tony
2012-06-04 19:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-04 22:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-24 17:54 ` [patch 2/2] x86: mce: Implement cmci poll mode for intel machines Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-25 6:24 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-05-25 7:31 ` Chen Gong
2012-05-25 9:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-25 12:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-05-28 9:47 ` Chen Gong
2012-05-28 9:52 ` Chen Gong
2012-06-04 2:37 ` Chen Gong
2012-06-04 20:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-05 11:47 ` Chen Gong
2012-06-05 12:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-06 1:36 ` Chen Gong
2012-06-06 9:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-06-05 13:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-06 7:21 ` Chen Gong
2012-06-06 9:18 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2012-06-06 10:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-06 12:24 ` Chen Gong
2012-06-06 12:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-06 14:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-06 14:46 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-07 3:32 ` Chen Gong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1206061056520.3086@ionos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome