mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 2/5] smpboot: Provide infrastructure for percpu hotplug threads
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:07:30 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1206141702300.3086@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1339685789.2559.37.camel@twins>

On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 07:47 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > RCU callback processing consumes the entire CPU in RCU_BOOST case where
> > processing runs at real-time priority.  This is analogous to RT throttling
> > in the scheduler. 
> 
> But previously we can in non-preemptible softirq context, why would if
> behave differently when done from a RT task?

softirqs are different. They loop ten times and then wake ksoftirqd
which runs with sched_other.

Though that's wonky, because if an interrupt arrives before ksoftirqd
can take over we loop another 10 times in irq_exit(). Rinse and
repeat.....

And the main difference is that the scheduler does not yell on the
softirq context, but it yells when an rt task monopolizes the cpu.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-14 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-13 11:00 [RFC patch 0/5] Per cpu thread hotplug infrastructure Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-13 11:00 ` [RFC patch 2/5] smpboot: Provide infrastructure for percpu hotplug threads Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-13 18:33   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-13 18:56     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-14  8:08       ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-14  8:17         ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-15  1:53           ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-15  9:58             ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-14  8:37         ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-14  8:38           ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-13 18:57   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-13 19:02     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-13 19:17       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-13 20:47         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-14  4:51           ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-14 11:20             ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-14 12:59               ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-14 13:01                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-14 14:47                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-14 14:56                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-06-14 15:07                       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2012-06-14 15:45                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-14 16:20                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-14 13:32                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-14 13:47                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-14 14:12                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-14 15:01                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-14 15:08                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-14 14:50                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-14 15:02                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-14 15:38                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-14 16:19                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-14 16:48                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-14 22:40             ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-06-14  8:31   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-14  8:44     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-18  8:47   ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2012-06-18  8:50     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-13 11:00 ` [RFC patch 1/5] kthread: Implement park/unpark facility Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-14  2:32   ` Namhyung Kim
2012-06-14  8:35     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-14  8:59       ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-14  8:36   ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-06-14 20:01   ` Silas Boyd-Wickizer
2012-06-14 20:13     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-14 22:13   ` Silas Boyd-Wickizer
2012-06-15  1:44     ` Tejun Heo
2012-06-13 11:00 ` [RFC patch 3/5] softirq: Use hotplug thread infrastructure Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-13 11:00 ` [RFC patch 4/5] watchdog: " Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-13 11:00 ` [RFC patch 5/5] infiniband: ehca: " Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-18  6:30   ` Rusty Russell
2012-06-18  8:08     ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-06-24 10:29       ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1206141702300.3086@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome