From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755420Ab2GaGFk (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 02:05:40 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:47325 "EHLO mail-wg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754832Ab2GaGFj (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Jul 2012 02:05:39 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 09:05:36 +0300 (EEST) From: Pekka Enberg X-X-Sender: penberg@tux.localdomain To: David Rientjes cc: shuah.khan@hp.com, cl@linux.com, glommer@parallels.com, js1304@gmail.com, shuahkhan@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH TRIVIAL] mm: Fix build warning in kmem_cache_create() In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1342221125.17464.8.camel@lorien2> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, David Rientjes wrote: > So much for compromise, I thought we had agreed that at least some of the > checks for !name, in_interrupt() or bad size values should be moved out > from under the #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_VM, but this wasn't done. This > discussion would be irrelevent if we actually did what we talked about. I didn't want to change the checks at the last minute and invalidate testing in linux-next but I'm more than happy to merge such a patch when the merge window closes. Pekka