mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-dev >> Lists Linaro-dev" <linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [resend] Timer broadcast question
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:10:06 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1302191904560.22263@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5123BE35.8070902@linaro.org>

On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> I am working on identifying the different wakeup sources from the
> interrupts and I have a question regarding the timer broadcast.
> 
> The broadcast timer is setup to the next event and that will wake up any
> idle cpu belonging to the "broadcast cpumask", right ?
> 
> The cpu which has been woken up will look for each cpu the next-event
> and send an IPI to wake it up.
>  
> Although, it is possible the sender of this IPI may not be concerned by
> the timer expiration and has been woken up just for sending the IPI, right ?

Correct.
 
> If this is correct, is it possible to setup the timer irq affinity to a
> cpu which will be concerned by the timer expiration ? so we prevent an
> unnecessary wake up for a cpu.

It is possible, but we never implemented it.

If we go there, we want to make that conditional on a property flag,
because some interrupt controllers especially on x86 only allow to
move the affinity from interrupt context, which is pointless.

Thanks,

	tglx




  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-19 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-19 18:02 Daniel Lezcano
2013-02-19 18:10 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2013-02-19 18:21   ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-02-19 22:46     ` Andy Lutomirski
2013-02-20 10:09       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-21  6:19     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-21  9:01       ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-02-21  9:14         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-21 22:01     ` [PATCH 1/2] time : pass broadcast device parameter Daniel Lezcano
2013-02-21 22:01       ` [PATCH 2/2][RFC] time : set broadcast irq affinity Daniel Lezcano
2013-02-22 17:55         ` Jacob Pan
2013-02-22 18:45           ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-02-25 22:50           ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-02-25 23:00             ` Jacob Pan
2013-02-26  8:45       ` [PATCH 1/2] time : pass broadcast device parameter Viresh Kumar
2013-02-26 11:30         ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-02-26 11:31         ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-02-26 12:14           ` Viresh Kumar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1302191904560.22263@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome