mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NOHZ, check to see if tick device is initialized in IRQ handling path
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 00:56:23 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1305030054530.2891@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1367325415-32283-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com>

On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Prarit Bhargava wrote:

> 2nd try at this ... going with a more global cc.
> 
> I think the linux.git "system hang" isn't really a hang.  For some reason the
> panic text wasn't displayed on the console.  I've seen this behaviour a few
> times now ... maybe there's a bug in the panic output path?
> 
> It seems that the power interrupt is an error with the CPU exceeded the
> OSes current requested frequency on the package.  If I disable on demand
> cpu frequency, the problem goes away.

Huch?
 
> Anyhoo, here's a patch...
> 
> ----8<----
> 
> When adding a CPU there is a small window in which interrupts are enabled and
> the clock tick device has not been initialized.  If an interrupt occurs in

What's that small window and why does it exist?

> this window, irq_exit() will be called which calls tick_nohz_irq_exit() which
> in turn calls __tick_nohz_idle_enter().
> 
> __tick_nohz_idle() enter assumes that the tick has been initialized.  In the
> above case, however, it has not and this leads to what appears to be a system
> hang on latest linux.git or a the following panic on RHEL6:
> 
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.32-358.el6.x86_64 #1
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810a89e5>]  [<ffffffff810a89e5>] tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick+0x2a5/0x3e0
> RSP: 0018:ffff88089c503f38  EFLAGS: 00010046
> RAX: ffffffff81c07520 RBX: ffff88089c5116a0 RCX: 000002f04bb18cd8
> RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 000000000000a1b5 RDI: 000002f04bb0eb23
> RBP: ffff88089c503f88 R08: ffff88089c50e060 R09: 0000000000000000
> R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000017
> R13: 000002f04bb17dd5 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000092
> FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88089c500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> CS:  0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
> CR2: 0000000000000078 CR3: 0000000001a85000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
> DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
> DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
> Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo ffff8810745c0000, task ffff8808740f2080)
> Stack:
>  00000000000116a0 0000000000000087 ffff88089c503f78 0000000000000046
> <d> ffff88089c503f98 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> <d> 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffff88089c503f98 ffffffff81076d86
> Call Trace:
>  <IRQ>
>  [<ffffffff81076d86>] irq_exit+0x76/0x90
>  [<ffffffff81028dd6>] smp_thermal_interrupt+0x26/0x40
>  [<ffffffff8100bcf3>] thermal_interrupt+0x13/0x20
>  <EOI>
>  [<ffffffff81506997>] ? start_secondary+0x127/0x2ef
>  [<ffffffff81506990>] ? start_secondary+0x120/0x2ef
> 
> The code currently assumes that the tick device is initialized when
> irq_enter() and irq_exit() are called.  This is not correct and a check must
> be performed prior to entering the tick code through these code paths to
> ensure that the tick device is initialized and running.
> 
> I've only seen this occur on a few systems.  I've tested with and without the
> patch and as far as I can tell this patch resolves the problem on
> linux.git top of tree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
> ---
>  kernel/time/tick-sched.c |   12 ++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index a19a399..5027187 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -567,6 +567,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tick_nohz_idle_enter);
>  void tick_nohz_irq_exit(void)
>  {
>  	struct tick_sched *ts = &__get_cpu_var(tick_cpu_sched);
> +	struct clock_event_device *dev =
> +				     __get_cpu_var(tick_cpu_device).evtdev;
> +
> +	/* Has the tick been initialized yet? */
> +	if (unlikely(!dev || dev->mode == CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED))
> +		return;
>  
>  	if (!ts->inidle)
>  		return;
> @@ -809,6 +815,12 @@ static inline void tick_check_nohz(int cpu) { }
>   */
>  void tick_check_idle(int cpu)
>  {
> +	struct clock_event_device *dev = per_cpu(tick_cpu_device, cpu).evtdev;
> +
> +	/* Has the tick been initialized yet? */
> +	if (unlikely(!dev || dev->mode == CLOCK_EVT_MODE_UNUSED))
> +		return;
> +
>  	tick_check_oneshot_broadcast(cpu);
>  	tick_check_nohz(cpu);
>  }
> -- 
> 1.7.9.3
> 
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-02 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-30 12:36 Prarit Bhargava
2013-05-02 22:51 ` Tony Luck
2013-05-02 22:56 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2013-05-03  8:10   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-05-03 12:34     ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-05-03 13:02       ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-05-03 13:43         ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-05-05  6:20         ` [tip:timers/urgent] tick: Cleanup NOHZ per cpu data on cpu down tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2013-05-05 19:54           ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-05-06  8:48             ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-05-05 12:48         ` tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2013-05-05 14:14         ` tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2013-05-12 10:27         ` tip-bot for Thomas Gleixner
2013-05-13 14:51           ` Prarit Bhargava
2013-05-13 19:10             ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-05-14 13:48               ` Prarit Bhargava
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-16  1:20 [PATCH] NOHZ, check to see if tick device is initialized in IRQ handling path Prarit Bhargava

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1305030054530.2891@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome