mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Wu, Fengguang" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
	"eag0628@gmail.com" <eag0628@gmail.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at kernel/smp.c:385 smp_call_function_many
Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 12:26:12 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1305281210400.4220@ionos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5195242A.4040007@oracle.com>

On Thu, 16 May 2013, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 08:29 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > Hi Liu,
> > 
> > On 04/18/2013 08:10 PM, Liu, Chuansheng wrote:
> >>> It seems that with commit "smp: Give WARN()ing when calling
> >>>> smp_call_function_many()/single() in serving irq" I'm getting a bunch of these:
> >> This patch gives the warning even when the smp_call_function_many() is called in softirq context,
> >> because it will bring the possible deadlock cases, the example is below:
> >> CPUA                            CPUB
> >>                                 spin_lock(&spinlock)
> >>                                 Any irq coming, call the irq handler
> >>                                 irq_exit()
> >> spin_lock_irq(&spinlock)
> >> <== Blocking here due to
> >> CPUB hold it
> >>                                   __do_softirq()
> >>                                     run_timer_softirq()
> >>                                       timer_cb()
> >>                                         call smp_call_function_many()
> >>                                           send IPI interrupt to CPUA
> >>                                             wait_csd()
> >>
> >> Then both CPUA and CPUB will be deadlocked here.
> > 
> > Right.

Well, that's only true if LOCKDEP is enabled. The !LOCKDEP case
reenables interrupts if the lock is contended.

> > So commit f55a6faa3 ("hrtimer: Provide clock_was_set_delayed()") followed by one
> > of the commits that used clock_was_set_delayed() may trigger the deadlock you've
> > described. (cc John Stultz...)

I'll have a look. It's non trivial to fix :(

Thanks,

	tglx

      reply	other threads:[~2013-05-28 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-18 21:05 Sasha Levin
2013-04-19  0:10 ` Liu, Chuansheng
2013-04-19  0:29   ` Sasha Levin
2013-05-16 18:23     ` Sasha Levin
2013-05-28 10:26       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.02.1305281210400.4220@ionos \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chuansheng.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=eag0628@gmail.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome