From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965164Ab3E2ITn (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2013 04:19:43 -0400 Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:54821 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965152Ab3E2ITk (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 May 2013 04:19:40 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 10:19:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Grant Likely cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Try out the irqdomain + generic chip integration series In-Reply-To: <1369793454-19197-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org> Message-ID: References: <1369793454-19197-1-git-send-email-grant.likely@linaro.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Grant, On Wed, 29 May 2013, Grant Likely wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Rather than just straight reviewing the generic irq chip patch series, I > tried it out by converting another driver to use it. As far as I've been > able to tell it does the right thing and you can have my ack. The first > patch in this series adds another feature needed by the versatile > driver. Patch 2 should be okay, but I'd like to get an ack from Ben > before it gets applied. I pick up #1 and push it with the other lot, so people can start working on top of that. I'll put it into a separate branch (irq/for-arm) so SoC folks can grab it from there to avoid inter tree dependencies. > I need to get someone to test patch 3 on hardware before you pick up > that one. Sure. It might also go through the SoC tree(s). > Oh, and I'll reply directly to patch 7 of your series with an ack and a > minor comment. Thanks, tglx