From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755608Ab3BZWJz (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:09:55 -0500 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:61878 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751503Ab3BZWJw (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:09:52 -0500 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 17:09:51 -0500 (EST) From: Nicolas Pitre To: Peter Korsgaard Cc: "Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer" , Kyungsik Lee , Andrew Morton , Russell King , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Michal Marek , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, celinux-dev@lists.celinuxforum.org, Nitin Gupta , Richard Purdie , Josh Triplett , Joe Millenbach , David Sterba , Richard Cochran , Albin Tonnerre , Egon Alter , hyojun.im@lge.com, chan.jeong@lge.com, raphael.andy.lee@gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Add support for LZ4-compressed kernel In-reply-to: <87fw0i7n6d.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-id: References: <1361859870-15751-1-git-send-email-kyungsik.lee@lge.com> <512D1C12.4080109@oberhumer.com> <87fw0i7n6d.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.03 (LFD 1266 2009-07-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > >>>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Pitre writes: > > Hi, > > >> Did you actually *try* the new LZO version and the patch (which is attached > >> once again) as explained in https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/3/367 ? > >> > >> Because the new LZO version is faster than LZ4 in my testing, at least > >> when comparing apples with apples and enabling unaligned access in > >> BOTH versions: > >> > >> armv7 (Cortex-A9), Linaro gcc-4.6 -O3, Silesia test corpus, 256 kB block-size: > >> > >> compression speed decompression speed > >> > >> LZO-2012 : 44 MB/sec 117 MB/sec no unaligned access > >> LZO-2013-UA : 47 MB/sec 167 MB/sec Unaligned Access > >> LZ4 r88 UA : 46 MB/sec 154 MB/sec Unaligned Access > > Nicolas> To be fair, you should also take into account the compressed > Nicolas> size of a typical ARM kernel. Sometimes a slightly slower > Nicolas> decompressor may be faster overall if the compressed image to > Nicolas> work on is smaller. > > Yes, but notice that lzo compressed BETTER than lz4 - E.G. from the > introduction mail: > > 1. ARMv7, 1.5GHz based board > Kernel: linux 3.4 > Uncompressed Kernel Size: 14MB > Compressed Size Decompression Speed > LZO 6.7MB 21.1MB/s > LZ4 7.3MB 29.1MB/s, 45.6MB/s(UA) OK. If LZO is now faster than LZ4 while still compressing more then I have no argument. Nicolas