From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S936016AbcIRUac (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:30:32 -0400
Received: from mail-qk0-f171.google.com ([209.85.220.171]:35035 "EHLO
        mail-qk0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S934338AbcIRUaY (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:30:24 -0400
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 16:30:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3) posix-timers: make it configurable
In-Reply-To: <20160918202207.GA13495@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1609181627240.9311@knanqh.ubzr>
References: <20160915210724.GB4245@localhost.localdomain> <20160915211555.GA16992@cloud> <alpine.LFD.2.20.1609151722080.9883@knanqh.ubzr> <20160915215649.GA17171@cloud> <20160916072421.GA14160@localhost.localdomain> <alpine.LFD.2.20.1609162251160.9883@knanqh.ubzr>
 <20160918143529.GA4651@localhost.localdomain> <alpine.LFD.2.20.1609181248390.9311@knanqh.ubzr> <20160918182054.GA9643@localhost.localdomain> <alpine.LFD.2.20.1609181444070.9311@knanqh.ubzr> <20160918202207.GA13495@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (LFD 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016, Richard Cochran wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 02:49:08PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > Who should merge this patch?
> 
> John, I guess.  Or do we need acks from the driver maintainers?  In
> that case, please post to netdev, and then davem can merge it.

I don't think the driver changes are significant enough to warrant a ACK 
from individual driver maintainers.

Yours would be welcome though.  ;-)

Then I'll resend the whole thing to John as a series and CC netdev.

What do you think?


Nicolas