From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MALFORMED_FREEMAIL, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF30CC43331 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 16:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A022073B for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 16:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="CoU0Gn3G" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2404254AbgDCQXI (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 12:23:08 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:35788 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728293AbgDCQXI (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 12:23:08 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id g3so6928214wrx.2 for ; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 09:23:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id:references :mime-version; bh=1gGWWeC2/OTnoDAZbJD9MrkCcGY0rWCnSshI7XLBK9s=; b=CoU0Gn3GhUUyoXblp3ViX6zxql2UAoZbEop/mUmzV98ectg7tucyl4x99VV1ltiuIR qvvBhII7aHD1Q8CQ1DqgvrQztNmwGO0/yA9lKXDu96apsF6T08YWUe/s6nH60fpTne5M Igyh7ZNMcHDsWJEc3Az8A/3rDyp2QDAYC7e4dDcyNMlQlFCejSHiZUAqUCjmKW7pduSp iN5b0+2cRJvvhkIB2C9C891axzLUO1zLbivONN8ELqgJj3cnB6NymLFs1GUgIiFdCMPo RDtJoFvImzbSdmvyT5+rIY3IHBxsm7+iW9IMAp6SKNB5FNx4P4lfmZbzs+m5gRqmuDb1 rgDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id :references:mime-version; bh=1gGWWeC2/OTnoDAZbJD9MrkCcGY0rWCnSshI7XLBK9s=; b=lFHkS5tU5vJW8ViNR6vrkT4DD/mAcxQENq0mY2oKMddE/VL0pEI47sSaQr13iXIS7G zH3S1PSMcyvTSYpgTuTbZitBHxzw+9SYHlDlQtfJ4gQx76TK29CCrOF9kp8uOx0hkaVG ml5p/WULLC1T52p/FQbqTFD6NcVFmSkYRgx8XYYmdNpqd5bg5E0ba9NN1Stya54foPPV UeBtFNWg4je+toS35nb2gg8zAFim4UhDkAx+GfqKm+uoDyOiH9/Nuf4tR2aDXzAEXEqd pmhFhaAvMNjER9VRqhixsr29uFJSCo7UAyXnp34cXp3e1GFmpvF+zh3tjgsOU4glRqUq K5aA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYJrLs+otbe/eQR/o1G7x0Qu6I5BJYzI5Y+A8L/KkV+OCRpq6AI 2LKAEmEQe6J7dn1SJx3qTQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLZfMaVxV5Ta1pcCvzH/arF2VJiE3LWc/nWKn8c4lA/UJQ6EgXiQi5a4vB54vWSGNPRbIEhtw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6187:: with SMTP id j7mr10285824wru.419.1585930986390; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 09:23:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earth.lan (host-92-23-85-227.as13285.net. [92.23.85.227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x18sm12612461wrr.2.2020.04.03.09.23.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 Apr 2020 09:23:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Jules Irenge X-Google-Original-From: Jules Irenge Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 17:23:04 +0100 (BST) To: Peter Zijlstra cc: Jules Irenge , julia.lawall@lip6.fr, boqun.feng@gmail.com, Jules Irenge , Ingo Molnar , Juri Lelli , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Steven Rostedt , Ben Segall , Mel Gorman , "open list:SCHEDULER" Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] sched/topology: Replace 1 and 0 by boolean value In-Reply-To: <20200330112752.GJ20696@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Message-ID: References: <0/10> <20200327212358.5752-1-jbi.octave@gmail.com> <20200327212358.5752-3-jbi.octave@gmail.com> <20200330112752.GJ20696@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 30 Mar 2020, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 09:23:49PM +0000, Jules Irenge wrote: >> From: Jules Irenge >> >> Coccinelle reports a warning inside sched_energy_aware_handler() >> >> WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable > > That's definitely not a warning and quite sensible in any case. Please > learn C. Thanks for the reply, I think I took the warning literally. I will take the advice any way. Thanks, Jules