From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752712Ab1GMWfp (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:35:45 -0400 Received: from swampdragon.chaosbits.net ([90.184.90.115]:11242 "EHLO swampdragon.chaosbits.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751778Ab1GMWfo (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 18:35:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:35:43 +0200 (CEST) From: Jesper Juhl To: Peter Zijlstra cc: Jiri Kosina , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Jan_H=2E_Sch=F6nherr?= , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] sched: Fix (harmless) typo 'CONFG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED' In-Reply-To: <1310595172.2586.48.camel@twins> Message-ID: References: <1310580816-10861-1-git-send-email-schnhrr@cs.tu-berlin.de> <1310580816-10861-2-git-send-email-schnhrr@cs.tu-berlin.de> <1310590281.2586.34.camel@twins> <1310595172.2586.48.camel@twins> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 00:07 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote: > > On Wed, 13 Jul 2011, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > > > > From: =?UTF-8?q?Jan=20H=2E=20Sch=C3=B6nherr?= > > > > > > WTF am I to do with crap like that?! > > > > Peter, > > > > well, umm, get a decent e-mai client? :) > > its my apply scripts that create rubbish, also I'll take recommendations > for a decent MUA, afaict they're all crap, mutt, claws, thunderbird, > evolution all suck rocks and its basically picking the one that sucks > least for your particular workflow. > I'd recommend alpine/re-alpine - works well with all mails I receive via LKML and elsewhere and I never get complaints about mangled emails from people I send patches to (ohh and I happen to like the user interface ;-) - check it out. > > git-am can also apply such thing without any problems with proper accents. > > that's assuming I actually use git at that stage, I find git to be an > utter pain to gather patches with. Don't know your workflow, but I can tell you what I do. I just have a branch for patches that I'm gathering that are not yet in upstream. Apply any new stuff there (or cherry-pick from other branches to my queue branch) and then regularly rebase that branch on master (Linus' tree). When I then want to resend some patches it's as simple as checking out my queue branch, doing a rebase to make sure there's no obsolete stuff in it and then git format-patch to generate mails for the patches I want to re-send and then read those patches in to re-alpine and send them. To me that's not very painfull, but of course it may not match your workflow - just a description of mine :-) . -- Jesper Juhl http://www.chaosbits.net/ Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please.