From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752071AbbJESDN (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:03:13 -0400
Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:7996 "EHLO mga11.intel.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750953AbbJESDL (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:03:11 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,639,1437462000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="658301001"
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 18:03:09 +0000 (UTC)
From: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
X-X-Sender: vmware@localhost.lm.intel.com
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        x86@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
        Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Bryan Veal <bryan.e.veal@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2] x86/pci: Initial commit for new VMD device
 driver
In-Reply-To: <20151005164624.GA13737@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1510051734310.23840@localhost.lm.intel.com>
References: <1443721454-25467-1-git-send-email-keith.busch@intel.com> <20151003094512.GA29104@gmail.com> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1510051424000.23840@localhost.lm.intel.com> <20151005164624.GA13737@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com> wrote:
>> The immediate benefit is that devices on VMD domains do not use resources
>> on the default PCI domain, so we have more than the 256 buses available.
>
> Would be nice to incorporate that information in the help text and in the
> changelog.

Fair enough. Perhaps we thought the "secondary domain" description
implied that information, but maybe we've been doing this too long. :)

Thanks for the feedback.