mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
To: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	matz@suse.de, live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Disable non-ABI-compliant optimisations for live patching
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 12:45:51 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1606231237470.6874@cbobk.fhfr.pm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160623100550.GB31609@lst.de>

On Thu, 23 Jun 2016, Torsten Duwe wrote:

> I haven't looked at the fentry solution, but the code I'm involved in saves
> the registers so that ftrace, live patch and friends can work freely. But
> then it restores all regs and _then_ calls the replacement, so ftrace
> saving all regs is no gain at all.

You're right, thanks for bringing this up.

In principle we should be able to modify the trampoline so that it 
performs its own register saving (in ftrace_regs_caller) and restoring 
(*), completely shielding the new function from any optimization gcc might 
have done on registers, shouldn't we?

(*) we'll have to piggy-back on ftrace_epilogue on that, i.e. making the 
    return to the original code go through trampoline as well (the same 
    way graph tracer works)

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-23 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-22 14:24 Torsten Duwe
2016-06-22 15:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-06-23  7:45   ` Miroslav Benes
2016-06-23 10:05     ` Torsten Duwe
2016-06-23 10:45       ` Jiri Kosina [this message]
2016-06-23 12:47         ` Jiri Kosina
2016-06-26 22:39           ` Pavel Machek
2016-06-27  6:59             ` Torsten Duwe
2016-06-26 22:37 ` Pavel Machek
2016-06-27  8:13   ` Jiri Kosina
2016-06-27  8:21     ` Pavel Machek
2016-06-27  8:26       ` Jiri Kosina
2016-06-27  8:32         ` Pavel Machek
2016-06-27 11:36           ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LNX.2.00.1606231237470.6874@cbobk.fhfr.pm \
    --to=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=duwe@lst.de \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matz@suse.de \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®